Saturday, March 27, 2010
The True POWER And The RIGHT of The JURY
I am doing this for two reasons. First it is my duty to inform my fellow citizens of the truth. Second this is to inform the voters of Arkansas of an Arkansas Supreme Court Candidate who doesn't believe the truth about Jury Nulification. That man is Judge John N. Fogleman.
I had a discussion with Mr. Fogleman in Clinton Arkansas on March 13th 2010 over Jury Nullification. I asked the Judge if he believed in Jury Nullification and he said no he does not, because they are only to judge the facts of the case, (not the validity of the law).
I challenged him over the issue because our founding fathers have said the Jury has the right to judge both the law and the facts. The Judge challenged me back with his version of the facts and that Mr. Thomas Paine is a founder that would support his view. I responded with some other founding fathers to support my view.
NOTE: Not all the founding fathers agreed on all the issues. Jury nullification was decided by consensus.
We ended the discussion with an agreement to research the matter: "The Power and the Right of the Jury to judge both the law and the facts is the issue that will be decided." I just hope that Mr. Fogleman has done his own research to double check himself. I also hope that upon the facts I have found that he would change his position. If he changes his position then a citizen should consider voting for him. However, if he does not amend his erroneous view, then a citizen should not vote for him because that would be re-installing a judge who does not uphold the Constitution.
You may be asking why are you doing this? I am doing this because the truth needs a crusade and I am a firm believer that the "Truth is not always in the majority." Just because the majority says so does not always make it right or the truth. Also this has to do with tyranny and liberty. His position is one of tyranny (It may not be purposeful but his viewpoint could be one of ignorance.) My position is one of freedom, liberty, and the American way and these liberties are in jeopardy in direct proportion to the deviation from the Constitution.
I have collected the quotes from several sources to keep from being accused of cherry picking. The founding Fathers, Supreme Court Justices, Court Rulings, news articles, and The JURY HANDBOOK.
First here is some quotes from some founding fathers and etc.
"The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy."
John Jay, 1st Chief Justice U. S. Supreme Court, 1789.
"The jury has the right to determine both the law and the facts."
Samuel Chase, U. S. supreme Court Justice, 1796, Signer of The unanimous Declaration.
"The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both law and fact."
Oliver Wendell Holmes, U. S. supreme Court Justice, 1902.
"The law itself is on trial quite as much as the cause which is to be decided."
Harlon F. Stone, 12th Chief Justice U. S. Supreme Court, 1941.
"The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard instructions of the judge..."
U. S. vs. Dougherty, 473 F 2nd 1113, 1139, (1972)
"Why do we love this trial by jury? Because it prevents the had of oppression from cutting you off... This gives me comfort-that, as long as I have existence, my neighbors will protect me."
Patrick Henry (Elliot, 3:545, 546).
Links for verification: HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE.
You see it is you the jury that have the final say. Our founding fathers put the power in to the peoples hands. Why? Because to keep us safe from bad law and tyranny of the government. Also to protect us from corrupt judges, prosecutors, city councils, city boards, county boards, county quorum court, state legislatures, and federal legislatures.
Friday, March 26, 2010
More from the Judge
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Judge Andrew Napolitano Speaks Out Against 'Obamacare' Law on The Alex Jones Show
Also my Friend Peter Schiff has also posted the interview. So here is some of his blogged comments and the link to his blog. Go check out his site because Mr. Schiff is full of great information also. "Judge Napolitano we do not have a two party system we have one party , the big Government party." "...the change does not come via election in this country says Judge Andrew Napolitano ...Alex Jones welcomes back to the show former New Jersey Superior Court Judge, political and legal analyst for Fox News, and the host of Freedom Watch and a talk radio show, Andrew Napolitano. Judge Napolitano is the author of several books, including Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks its Own Laws, A Nation of Sheep, and Lies the Government Told You: Myth" Check out Peter Shiff's blog HERE
You can watch the rest of the video interviews at the Alex Jones Channel HERE.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Health Care Bill makes Health Care Worse.
I just can't wait for all of the mess to hit the fan, then our government can come in again and say we need reform and in return they just make it worse. Sounds like the old Cloward-Piven strategy at work here.
The Truth About Healthcare in America
1. The Social Safety Net did not exist for the most part prior to the last Great Depression. It wasn't necessary because the family, Church and community took care of their own. Three generations often resided under one roof and homeopathic medicine was the primary treatment for most maladies. Prior to 1929, half of Americans lived on the farm and half in the cities. People took care of their own.
2. Today, 97% of Americans live in an urbanized setting. We no longer grow our own food. The nuclear family, let alone the extended family, no longer exists in most cases. Most of our Churches have become dysfunctional and our communities have grown morally bankrupt.
3. FDR passed Social Security Legislation as part of his "New Deal" legislation in the 1930s. Originally, it only paid out retirement benefits when an individual lived longer than the life expectancy of most Americans.
"When Social Security was launched 70 years ago Sunday, it was meant to be a supplement for retirees, not a full pension. But today, 10.6 million people, or 22% of the 48 million who will receive Social Security benefits this year, live on that check alone, the Social Security Administration says...AARP, the senior advocacy group, says 25% of retired women, including 46% of unmarried Hispanic women, have no income beyond Social Security. AARP also says 33% of retired African-Americans live on Social Security alone.
Those numbers could grow as the baby boom generation enters retirement. Currently, 53% of people in the workforce have no pension, and 32% have no savings set aside for retirement. The number of traditional pension plans — the kind that guarantee a set amount of money for life and that have propped up many of the pre-boomer generation — has fallen to 29,651 in 2004 from 112,208 in 1985...The average Social Security payout is $955 a month, $11,460 annually." (source)
Social Security is grossly underfunded without any reserves. Contrary to what most people think, all current Social Security obligations are paid for with borrowed money an current tax obligations. Employers pay 7.65% of the employees payroll up to $102,000 (6.2% for Social Security and 1.45% for Medicare). The employee pays the other half for a total of 15.3% of an employees gross income. The self-employed pay a simular tax, called the self-employment tax.
So, in essence, 15.3% of most peoples income goes into Social Security. Because of using that money for other obligations and not investing it, the program is for all intents and purposes, bankrupt.
This is not being helped by illegal aliens receiving Social Security benefits, or the current 20% real unemployment rate. NAFTA, GATT and multi-national corporations can produce goods and services in third-world countries without the cost of producing them in the US and Europe. In other words, it is not going to get any better.
Add to this the average male and female now live into their 80s and will receive benefits for 20-25 years and you begin to see the mess the politicians and their co-conspirators have gotten us into.
Now, think about this. There are an estimated 1,000 Trillion dollars in unpaid derivatives contracts out there. The trillions in bail-out money hasn't even scratched the surface. The global economy is only 35 trillion dollars, so that gives you a small taste of the magnitude of the real problem.
This "health reform" law is nothing more than a political distraction, designed to take our focus off of the fact that:
1. The Federal Reserve Banking System has robbed us blind.
2. The national debt, most of which is owed to the Fed for using their worthless paper currency, has robbed us of our future.
3. One thousand trillion dollars in derivatives contracts will lead to a major debt default with hyper-inflation. Our creditors will use this as a pretext for war. Don't believe me? Just ask Argentina what happened when they defaulted on foreign debts. They lost the Faulklands.
4. Illegal immigration, with little enforcement, has made our labor force even less attractive to many employers. We cost money. They cost little.
We will discuss this in more detail in our next article.
It seems Paul A Drockton has about covered it all in this article. You can access the sources at this LINK.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Congress Democrats Plot Against Constitution
Monday, March 15, 2010
The Health Care Reform Bill in a Nutt Shell
Tyranny is at our door. Just wait until it passes and it will be inside the door.That is the problem with the incremental ism that has taken place over the years. It is us the liberty loving Americans always doing the compromising. We keep loosing freedoms cause we think if we give in this time that will be all, but history teaches us that is not the case. They always come back and want more of our freedoms and liberty. Are we going to give in or are we going to finally draw the line?
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Judge Napolitano at 2010 CPAC
Monday, March 8, 2010
Dissenters To Be Detained As “Enemy Belligerents”?
Since the establishment media is convinced that tea party members, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, Ron Paul supporters, and basically anyone with a dissenting political opinion is a likely domestic terrorist, they should be celebrating the fact that a new bill would allow the government to detain such people as “enemy belligerents” indefinitely and without trial based on their “suspected activity”.
The “Enemy Belligerent, Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010,” introduced by Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman on Thursday with little fanfare, “sets out a comprehensive policy for the detention, interrogation and trial of suspected enemy belligerents who are believed to have engaged in hostilities against the United States by requiring these individuals to be held in military custody, interrogated for their intelligence value and not provided with a Miranda warning,” The Atlantic "A Detention Bill You Ought to Read More Carefully"...
The bill does not distinguish between U.S. citizens and non-citizens, and states that “suspected belligerents” who are “considered a “high-value detainee” shall not be provided with a Miranda warning.”
A person is considered a “high value detainee” if they fulfil one of the following criteria.
(1) poses a threat of an attack on civilians or civilian facilities within the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad; (2) poses a threat to U.S. military personnel or U.S. military facilities; (3) potential intelligence value; (4) is a member of al Qaeda or a terrorist group affiliated with al Qaeda or (5) such other matters as the President considers appropriate...
Pay specific attention to the powers given to the President in part 5.
I talked and warned about this back last spring when the MIAC report and the Homeland security reports came out. In the reports it describes patriots, gun owners, anti-abortion, Christians, anti-tax, end the Federal Reserve protesters, and Veterans as domestic terrorists. Get ready folks cause Nazi Germany on steroids is coming up on us here in America. I hope not but it doesn't look good.
Full story HERE.
The Pentagon shooter, who was he?
Sunday, March 7, 2010
The miss Labeling of Labels
The full Washington Post article HERE.
By Joby Warrick and Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 6, 2010
The setting was seemingly random: an outer gate at the Pentagon at evening rush hour. But John Patrick Bedell's violent rampage Thursday made him only the latest in the growing ranks of the disaffected and disturbed to take aim at a symbol of official Washington
The shooting contained jarring echoes of other recent attacks, from last month's plane crash at an IRS building in Texas to the shooting last June of a museum guard at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in the District. Although the circumstances differ greatly, all were acts of rage by men who blamed their personal misfortunes on what they perceived to be sinister forces within the government
All three also appear to have drawn ideological nourishment from the same well: online communities of like-minded people who validate and amplify extreme views. Today, more than in recent years, such communities are tapping into a broad undercurrent of anti-government discontent fueled by economic recession, joblessness and concern over the growing federal deficit, according to experts who have studied the phenomenon
For Bedell and others like him, Washington and its institutions are an irresistible target -- the "ultimate symbol of power for the powerless," said Jerrold Post, a professor of political psychology at George Washington University.
"We've always had individuals who strike out at the giant 'system' when they're feeling a sense of powerlessness and insignificance," said Post, author of "Political Paranoia: The Psychopolitics of Hatred," a book on extremist movements. "Now we see an alarming tendency in which these same individuals can find substantiation online for almost any point of view."...
Get ready for the msm attack machine to go into high gear. They will use every trick in the book to get you to think that the other guy is a radical. This is a sure sign that the establishment is in fear of loosing the power they have had for more than sixty years. Don't underestimate these people, they are ruthless, and will do whatever it takes to maintain their control.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
It is Time to Stop Being and Start Being
For way to long we have been divided in this country. We have been divided between liberal-conservative, left-right, and Democrat-Republican. You see the establishment and the controlled msm keep us in these camps. The left commentators blame everything on the evil right and the right blames everything on the left. This is how they keep us divided. We spend more time fighting with one another and in reality we have more in common than we do not. Jesus said a house divided cannot stand. The old divide and conquer strategy and it is working masterfully. You see if they can keep us fighting over the little things then the elite can get those politicians to pass bills that really matter to them. Granted that their has been some bills defeated but that is cause we have come together and stood as good Americans.
This how we stand together. We look at the issues that really matter and that we agree on. We stick to the Constitution (all parts of it) and demand our elected officials follow it ( cause they take an Oath to the Constitution.) Once the federal government has been rolled back into the boundaries of the Constitution. Then we at the state and local level can have a legitimate debate and action on how we execute the solutions to the differences and problems.
I know that this is contrary to most of our political philosophy. I know that this will take a lot of swallowing of pride. I know that it will be a long hard process and not a overnight solution. But we didn't arrive here in this situation over night. I know we will have to put country first and political parties and personnel agendas last.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Citibank Controversy Puts Dubious FDIC Guarantee Back In The Spotlight
The Federal Reserve is at it again, and they are robbing us. It is only going to get worse so prepare for the worse and hope for the best.
Alex Jones and The Drudge Report reported on this on Monday.
The recent controversy surrounding Citibank’s advisory to its customers reserving the right to impose a 7 day restriction on withdrawals from their accounts is a stark reminder of the vulnerability of the fractional reserve banking system and the FDIC’s shaky guarantee that it can insure deposits in the event of a bank run...
Full story HERE
Monday, February 22, 2010
Americans Who Know Their Rights Are The Real Target Of Napolitano’s “Domestic Terror” Warning
Freedom is not easy and not free. We must guard our freedoms with our lives or someone else will take them. Government is there to protect our rights not grant them.
Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano cited examples of Muslim extremists in her warning Sunday that domestic terrorists were now as much a focus as international terrorism, but actual training manuals being used by state and federal authorities across America reveal that the primary target of the anti-terror apparatus hits a lot closer to home...
...“In the last year, Napolitano said, she’s witnessed a movement from international extremism to domestic extremism – cases in which Americans radicalized and decided to plot attacks against the country.”
However, Napolitano’s comments were clearly crafted to appeal to some on the right who claim that the Obama administration, despite its clear intensification of Bush’s “war on terror” with more raids into Pakistan and new targets in Yemen, has been “soft” on terror, with the DHS Secretary listing examples of Muslim Americans who have allegedly planned terror attacks (but not without aggressive prompting by FBI informants in almost every case).
In reality, as leaked state and federal documents illustrate, the primary focus of the war on terror is aimed at American citizens who exercise or merely show an interest in their own constitutional rights...
...Leaked state and federal documents produced since the early nineties have routinely labeled politically active Americans, or merely those cognizant of their constitutional rights, as the main domestic extremist threat...
Full article with links can be read HERE.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
CNN Broadcasts Major Cyber War Game Propaganda
Folks I watched part of this special on CNN and I could not believe some of the things these people said. We had better watch out and be on our toes. We are being prepped to accept the complete take over of our lives by our government. I really hope not but we shall see.
...From the NewsonNews website:
CNN will air a two-hour production, We Were Warned: Cyber Shockwave, based upon exclusive television access to a national security cyber “war game” scenario. The simulated event was developed by The Bipartisan Policy Center and will debut Saturday, Feb. 20 and Sunday, Feb. 21 at 8pm, 11pm and 2am ET on CNN. The scenario was created by Fmr. CIA Director, General Michael Hayden (ret.) as well as the co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, Fmr. Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-IN) and Fmr. Gov. Thomas Kean (R-NJ).
The simulation includes the usual government insiders acting as government officials (no acting required — they are all former government officials) who have gathered in the “situation room” to confront a cyber attack shutting down telecommunications and the power grid on the east coast.
Additional participants who served various roles for the scenario are: Fmr. U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, Fmr. Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte, Fmr. White House Homeland Security Advisor and CNN contributor Fran Townsend, Fmr. Director of Central Intelligence John McLaughlin, Fmr. U.S. Senator Bennett Johnston, Jr. (D-LA), Fmr. National Economic Council Director Stephen Friedman, Fmr. U.S. Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, Fmr. White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart, Fmr. National Security Agency General Counsel Stewart Baker, and Gen. Charles Wald, USAF (Ret.), former Deputy Commander of the United States European Command.
How should the government deal with the threat? Federalize the National Guard to deal with unruly mobs freaking out over the loss of electricity. Nationalize utility companies so the NSA and the government get electricity. The participants also recommended new powers be granted to the president. Not surprisingly, they declared the president has the authority to take unprecedented action against the states and the private sector under the Constitution
CNN and the participants agreed the slick propaganda presentation is aimed at the American people.
For full story by Kurt Nimmo HERE.
Friday, February 19, 2010
Glenn Beck Associates Tea Parties With Austin Bomber, Asks If Austin Bomber Is “Radical Constitutionalist”
Just pay attention who the msm (including fox news and Glen Beck) start attacking a group or a person, then that is the person the establishment thinks is a threat to them.
Coaxed in rhetoric and uncertainty Glenn Beck on his TV show immediately after the Austin plane attack clearly suggested there may be a relation between the bomber and the Tea Party movement. He went into a scripted screed about how the tea parties need to get away from anyone calling for a revolution, “whether it’s a Tea Party revolution or a communist one.” He knows full well the Tea party movement is about a restoration of our constitution and bill of rights, no one has ever suggested a violent revolution involving flying planes into buildings and for him to even suggest that there is any connection shows his true colors...
Come and check out the rest of this article, videos and links. HERE
Friday, February 12, 2010
A Warning To The Tea Party Nation
A Warning To The Tea Party NationBy Chuck BaldwinFebruary 12, 2010
As far as grassroots activism goes, the surge in Tea Parties across Americais one of the more encouraging developments to recently take place. Itreminds me of the "Conservative Revolution" of 1994, when the GOP reclaimedboth the US Senate and House of Representatives. At that time, it had beenover 40 years since the Republican Party controlled both the US House andSenate. And, between the two, the House victories were the most significant.
Spurred mostly by the election of Bill Clinton in 1992, a host of young,energetic freshman Republicans marched into Washington, D.C., determined toreturn a burgeoning and out-of-control federal leviathan to theconstitutional precepts of limited government. I'm talking aboutthen-freshman House members such as Helen Chenoweth, Steve Largent, BobBarr, Joe Scarborough, Sonny Bono, John Shadegg, J.C. Watts, etc. Theseyoung conservatives went to Washington, D.C., determined to reduce thegrowth and size of the federal government
The vehicle used to transport these young conservatives from grassrootsactivism to US House and Senate seats was the highly touted "Contract withAmerica" (CWA), which was orchestrated by House Speaker-to-be, NewtGingrich. The CWA included a promise to the American people that if theywould give the GOP a majority in Congress, they would eliminate up to 5federal departments--such as the Departments of Energy and Education--andmany federal agencies.
Obviously, not only did the GOP-controlled Congress not eliminate a singlefederal department or agency--or even shrink the size of the federalgovernment at all--it expanded the size and scope of the federal governmentat every level. And there is one reason for it: Big Government neoconsposing as champions of conservatism co-opted and destroyed the ConservativeRevolution of 1994.
If one wants to put names to these treasonous wretches (and I do), I'mtalking about charlatans such as Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott. Anyone whothinks that Newt Gingrich is a real conservative or that he will do anythingto reduce the size and scope of the federal government needs to speak withany of those Republican members of the freshman class of 1994. (Sadly, too,some of the members of that great freshman class went on to become BigGovernment toadies themselves. Such is the power of that Putrid Province bythe Potomac.)
The Tea Parties of 2010 remind me very much of the Conservative Revolutionof 1994. And if the Tea Party Nation is not very careful, they will succumbto the same fate. The signs of a silent takeover of the movement are alreadyappearing.
First of all, the Tea Parties were actually born during the Presidentialcampaign of Congressman Ron Paul of Texas in 2007 and 2008. For all intentsand purposes, the Tea Parties and the Ron Paul Revolution were one and thesame. These were (mostly) young people, who were sick and tired of the sameold establishment Republican Party. They were tired of establishmentRepublicans selling out the principles of limited government; they weretired of the US Constitution being ignored and trampled by both Republicansand Democrats; they were tired of an incessant interventionist US foreignpolicy that keeps sending US forces overseas to advance a burgeoning NewWorld Order (NWO); they were tired of perpetual war; they were tired of thebank bailouts; they were tired of the Federal Reserve; etc
I know this because I met--and spoke before--the Tea Party Nation in Stateafter State as I campaigned for Dr. Paul during the Republican primariesback in 2008. And I met them again all over America, as I was running as anIndependent candidate for President--with Ron Paul's endorsement, no less. Iwas with them in scores of meetings (big and small) from Washington, D.C.,to Spokane, Washington, and all points in between.
But now many of the Tea Parties are distancing themselves from Dr. Paul andembracing establishment players such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. EvenNewt Gingrich is being courted. Watch out, Tea Party Nation: you're indanger of losing your soul! Newt Gingrich is not one of you. He is not yourfriend. He is an imposter. He will destroy you just like he almostsingle-handedly destroyed the Conservative Revolution of 1994
Plus, be careful about Sarah Palin and other establishment Republicans.Palin is currently playing both sides. She is promoting Big Governmentneocons such as John McCain on the one hand, and sincereconservative-libertarians such as Rand Paul on the other hand. But if onewants a real barometer of Palin's true colors, look no further than herendorsement of Rick Perry in Texas.
Perry is the quintessential establishment Republican. Perry has been inoffice for some 9 years, and what has he done to thwart the NWO in Texas?Nothing! Perry is even a Bilderberg Group attendee. What has he done forState sovereignty in Texas? Nothing! In fact, he supports the North AmericanUnion and the NAFTA superhighway. What has he done to resist Obama'suniversal health care proposals? Nothing! What has he done to protect thecitizens of Texas against an emerging Police State? Nothing! What has hedone to fight illegal immigration? Nothing!
As a result of both Rick Perry's establishment business-as-usual politics inTexas and the proliferating grassroots Tea Party movement, counterattackingestablishment politics, a Tea Partier herself has entered the race for Texasgovernor. Her name is Debra Medina. As the Tea Party Nation in Texas alreadyknows, Medina is one of you.
Medina is committed to preserving Texas' independence and sovereignty. Sheis opposed to the Patriot Act. She will secure the Texas border. She willgive Texas Vermont-style open carry freedoms for gun owners. She wants toget rid of unconstitutional property taxes in Texas. She will stop the NAFTAsuperhighway. Medina is the real deal.
So, what did Sarah Palin do? She went to Texas and endorsed Rick Perry! I'msorry, ladies and gentlemen, playing political games in order to rake inhundreds of thousands of dollars on the speaking and book-signing circuitsis not what the Tea Parties are all about.
Tea Parties are supposed to be about putting principle over politics,supporting and defending the US Constitution, supporting limited governmentand personal liberty, getting rid of the Federal Reserve, abolishing theIRS, ending preemptive and pervasive wars, and putting truth and integrityback into government.
Don't get me wrong; there are things about Sarah Palin that I like. Iespecially appreciate her pro-life and pro-Second Amendment stands. I alsoappreciate her signing the Alaska State sovereignty resolution while she wasgovernor. By all indications, she did a good job as Alaska's chiefexecutive. At the national level, however, she favors the Patriot Act--andeven wants to expand it. She supported the banker bailouts. And when itcomes to foreign policy issues, Palin is just another neocon. Plus, as withmost Republicans at the national level, I think she is clueless about theNWO. And please remember, it was Mr. New World Order himself, HenryKissinger, who vetted Palin on behalf of McCain.
The Tea Party Nation should expect better!
The Nation also needs to be careful about Glenn Beck. He says many of theright things. He is likeable and charismatic; but he's also dead wrong on anumber of issues--issues that are critical to the Tea Party Nation. He'sdead wrong when he attempts to disparage and impugn Congressman Ron Paul,saying Dr. Paul is a "crazy, kooky guy." He's dead wrong in supporting thebanker bailouts. He's dead wrong when he supports raising taxes (which hehas done on several occasions). He was dead wrong when he supported thePatriot Act. He is dead wrong when he viciously attacks the 9/11 victims'families who demand further information about what happened to their lovedones on that fateful day. And he is dead wrong when he mocks people such asAlan Keyes and Joe Farah for demanding that Barack Obama release his birthcertificate--if he indeed has one.
And now I hear that there are some self-professed members of the Tea PartyNation who are actually running for Congressman Paul's US House seat inTexas. If this is not a sign that establishment Republicans are hijackingthe Tea Party movement, I don't know what is. Remember, the Tea Partymovement began as a support base for the Ron Paul Revolution back in 2007.
I strongly encourage the Tea Party faithful to read Jane Hamsher's recentcolumn on this subject:
Important article from Jane Hamsher
I say again, be careful, Tea Party Nation. You are being infiltrated. Youare being compromised. You are being neutered. Stick to your principles.Stick with the Constitution. Keep opposing unconstitutional, preemptivewars. Keep calling for the abolition of the Federal Reserve. Keep fightingfor less taxes, reduced federal spending, and states' rights. Keep opposingthe Patriot Act and the New World Order. Don't abandon Ron Paul. Be wary ofpeople such as Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. You don't need "big name"celebrities to give you credibility. As Samson's strength depended onkeeping his hair uncut, your strength lies in keeping your principlesintact. And unless you want to wind up like the Republican freshmen in 1994,avoid Newt Gingrich like the plague!
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Alex Jones on Sarah Palin and the illusion of change
Stop supporting someone just because they have a letter by there name. Stop supporting policies just because you identify with that letter by that name. Stop complaining about policies just because the other letter by the name is in charge. Can you not see that by turning a blind eye to unconstitutional government by your side, and then complaining about it when the other (so called side) side is in charge changes nothing, and we are still in this mess.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Ron Paul Warns of Social Unrest and Martial Law and how the American Citizen Becomes a Terrorist part 3
Monday, February 1, 2010
Cramer pleads ‘Trust Bernanke’; the ‘Bavarian Illuminati, Trilateral Commission & Queen are not all bad’
Full story by Aaron Dykes HERE. In the link provided is more videos and links in the article.
At some point and time everyone will have to come to the conclusion, that the Biblical prophecy of world government controlled by a ruthless leader is coming true. It is a lot closer than a lot of people think and only a few key things have to happen for all of it to fall into place.